Week 10 Journal
Week
10
1)
In your own words and using
referenced quotes describe what is meant in strategy by ‘Organizational
Purpose’ and describe what is meant by “Corporate Social Responsibility”.
2)
Should organizations
focus more on profit and shareholder satisfaction or responsibility and
stakeholder satisfaction? Discuss your own thoughts but try to support your
ideas with theory or examples.
3)
Write about your experiences with today’s
case study. What answers did you give to the questions? What did you think of
CEO?
Answers
1) Organisational
purpose strategy focuses on how the organization needs to change over a period
time in order to be able to deliver the strategy of the enterprise and an
actionable plan of how to make the transformation. This requires both the
thinking and analysis to compare current state to desired state and define the
gap, and the execution capabilities to make the requisite changes happen. From organizational
purpose strategy, vision and mission facilitates the essential foundation for
making strategic choice. The mission, vision and organization purpose describe
what the organization needs to be consider for the long term and short term
organizational goals, objectives and success.
The key strategic consideration in organizational
purpose strategy includes:
a)
Organizational design
b)
Organizational competitiveness
c)
Organizational culture
d)
Talent management practices
e)
Capability requirements
In addition to above mention
points the organizational purpose strategy consists of organizational beliefs,
business definition and organizational values.
An organizational belief insists the
strategists to explore the ideas and assumptions of the organization. The
business definition explains about where the firm operates. It tells you to
operate in those markets in which a firm has a competitive advantage. An
organizational value explores the important factors that a firm should hold.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
A company`s sense of
responsibility towards the community and environment both ecological and social
in which it operates is known as corporate social responsibility. According to
the World Business Council for Sustainable Development “Corporate Social Responsibility is the commitment by organizations to behave ethically and contribute
to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce
and their families as well as the local community and society at large”.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has
emerged as a significant theme in the global business community and is
gradually becoming a mainstream activity. But questions has arise does the
share holders and other stake holder of company gradually accepts it.
The growing emphasis
on corporate responsibility is affecting the relationship between companies and
their various stakeholders, such as investors, customers, vendors, suppliers,
employees, communities and governments.
At current most
of the renowned organization uses the CSR as a benchmarking strategy.
Benchmarking strategy not only helps to compete with their rivals but also help
to gain competitive advantage. Only
implementing corporate social responsibility is not enough it should also be
managed carefully over the period along with the business of company.
2)
In my view, I think any organization should give more
priority to the responsibility and stakeholder’s satisfaction. It is common
that every organization ultimate goals is to earn more profit. But for earning
profit only shareholders fund is not enough, the cooperation and decisions
among the stakeholders is must. Stake holders in the organizations include customers,
vendors, suppliers, employees, communities and governments. We are mankind and have adopted to change with time, same
apply to the organization. Organization should change with time and this helps
in grabbing opportunity and eliminates threats.
Let`s see one
example, If any organization just focuses on shareholders wealth maximization
then this will decline the chance of getting involved with society, failed to
learn people attitudes and behavior, will be outdated in the society and with
their unique preferences, relations with stakeholders might get affected and
finally the main purpose “earning profit and maximizing share holders wealth”
will be collapsed. In other hand let`s see if the company focuses on the
responsibility and stakeholders satisfaction. Responsibilities define the task
and are separated among the employees through different department. When responsibilities
are done sincerely by the employee then the company can engage with society,
they can innoviate new products by which they can satisfy customers and
ultimately by satisfying customer they can gain competitive advantage and make
huge profit. So any organization should focus on their employee’s welfare. A business firm can only be developed when
their employees are happy as they are the pillars of an organization. To make
sure the employee are happy the company should provide benefits and perks
regularly.
Customers and
suppliers are important stakeholders to the organization. Without customer we
cannot do business, they should be treated like a god and should serve in their
best interest. Suppliers provide all the raw materials and equipments and
business cannot be run without these things. So organization should also make
them happy.
With all these
things organization can build a good platform of business and enormous profit
can be made. So, satisfying stakeholders and focusing on responsibility should
be more focused than satisfying shareholders and earning profit.
3) The case study we did today was about the PepsiCo. PepsiCo
incorporation is an American multinational food and beverage corporation with interests in
the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of grain-based snack foods,
beverages, and other products. We watched the video interview of Indra Nooyi.
She is the CEO and chairman of company. The case study was interesting and
focused on the rivalry between Coca- Cola and Pepsi Co, the effort and strategy
Pepsi Co. has implemented to regain the market share and the mission, vision
and goal of Pepsi Co.
Case study
questions and answers.
a)
What are PepsiCo’s strategic objectives? Why does the firm
exist?
The strategic
objective of Pepsi Co. seems to regain the market share and increase the
revenue by increasing the sales of nutritious products. According to Indra
Nooyi, the company is targeting to triple the revenue of nutritious products,
to $30 billion by 2020. This shows PepsiCo
strategy seems to be emergent. Due to the declining market share in America,
they are targeting Asian countries as the new markets for beverage products and
also the company is trying to increase the product line increasing the
portfolio in business.
The firm exists
to serve its main organizational purpose which is to provide quality products
and services within reasonable price than competitors. By serving this they
earn revenue and satisfy the interest of shareholders and stakeholders.
b)
What are the possible strengths and benefits of the strategy?
The possible
benefits and strength of the Pepsi Co. strategy are:
·
Increase in market share
·
Employment empowerment
·
Increasing product line
·
Increase in marketing sector
·
Employment opportunity to local
·
Huge accumulated fund
·
Innovation to nutritious foods and beverages
c)
What are the possible weakness and disadvantages of the
strategy?
The possible
weaknesses of strategy are:
·
Low preferences from customer
·
Packaging is not attractive
·
Not the number one player in beverage industry
·
Market share smaller than Coca-Cola
·
High risk
·
Chances of failure in
product line.
·
Shareholders dissatisfaction.
d)
Do you think the organization has the right balance between
profitability and responsibility?
Though the
company has launched products called “GOOD FOR YOU” which is promoted as a
healthier product and implement the Refresh Project which helped numerous
homeless shelters and orphanages, I think they can make more contribution to
save the environment from pollution and promise to support the environmental
rules and after only there will be the balances between profitability and
responsibility.
.
References
· Robert Kaplan and David Norton (3rd
Edition, 2000). The Strategy- Focused Organization. Harvard Business School
Press.
· Kenneth Amaeshi, Paul Nnodim, Osuji Onyeka
(1st
Edition, 2012). Corporate Social Responsibility, Entrepreneurship and Innoviation.
Routledge Publisher.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home