Week 16 Journal
Week 16
1)
In your own words and using referenced
quotes describe the difference between organic growth, merger and acquisition
and strategic alliance.
2)
Give an example of a company that has
grown through a) organic growth, b) merger or acquisition and c) strategic
alliance.
3)
Briefly discuss the merger between
Britvic and AG Barr. What advice would you give to the new board?
Answers
1)
Organic
Growth
Organic
growth strategy refers to a company expanding its business through the use of
its own resource and assets. Organic growth follows the “Do It Yourself”
strategy. Organic growth allows company
to set and achieve corporate goals in which ever manner they choose. Organic
growth strategies are built on four main pillars. They are revenue, headcount,
PR and quality.
Many
well known, public company uses organic growth strategies. Some of them are
Best Buy, Outback Steak House and Tiffany and Company.
The
main advantages of organic growth are
·
Spreading investment over time.
·
No availability constraints.
·
Strategic independence.
Merger
and Acquisition
Merger
and Acquisition is an aspect of corporate strategy, and management dealing
with the buying, selling, dividing
and combining of different companies and similar entities that can help an
enterprise grow rapidly in its sector. Merger and Acquisitions follow the
“Buying Strategy”.
The best example of merger is Compaq merging
with Hp and acquisition is SPSS acquisition by IBM.
The
companies to follow this strategy are driven by three strategic motives. They
are;
·
Financial motive (financial efficiency,
tax efficiency and assets stripping or unbundling )
·
Managerial motive (Personal ambition,
Bandwagon effects)
·
Strategic motive (extension,
consolidation and capabilities)
Strategic
Alliance
An
agreement between two companies that have decided to share resources to
undertake a specific strategy for the mutual benefits is known as strategic
alliance. Strategic alliance lies between merger and acquisition (M&A) and
organic growth.
There
are two main kinds of ownership in strategic alliance, equity and non equity
alliance. Equity alliances involve the creation of a new entity that is owned
separately by the partners involved. Example, Nokia and Microsoft. Non-equity
alliances are typically looser, without the commitment implied by
ownership. Example, Renault is a
strategic investor in Nissan.
Motives for Strategic alliances:
·
The need for critical mass is the
major motives for strategic alliance. It can be achieved by forming partnerships
either with the competitors or suppliers of the raw materials. This may drive
towards cost reduction, sharing risks and improved customer offering.
·
Co-specialization allows each
partner to work and activities that best suit their capabilities. For instance,
alliance is widely used when an organization enters into a new market with
different geographical characteristics. Now, the company needs local knowledge
and knowledge about distribution, marketing, advertising and customer support.
·
A complementary alliance is another
motive for strategic alliances. It brings together matching strengths to
counteract the other partner’s weaknesses.
The differences between organic growth, merger
and acquisition and strategic alliance are:
1) Organic
growth strategy makes the internal development of organization very slow.
Development of capabilities might be outdated because of lack of experience and
marketing skills.
Where as in
alliance, the development process is better than organic growth, on the contrary, acquisition is the quickest method of
strategy development.
2)
Organic growth best work with soft
resources rather than hard resources. There will be a cultural consistency
because the capabilities are developed with an organization. Acquisition best
work with hard resources and cultural and valuation problems may arise.
Strategic alliance may face difficulties like culture and control problems.
3)
Organic growth will be the best
strategy if an organization is willing to develop in new venture units. Strategic
alliance will be best if the organization has the ability to alliance with
relevant partner unit. But in acquisition organization might feel difficulties
in buying the whole organization.
Answer
2)
Organic
Growth
The
company that has growth through the organic growth is Bibby Line Group. Bibby Line Group is characterized by
organic growth. Starting with seven ships at the beginning of the nineteenth
century, the company expanded over the next 20 years to acquire another 18
vessels. Initially it focused on routes to Mediterranean ports, before
expanding to support trade with India, China and, later still, South America.
Its ships carried many different cargoes, including cotton, sugar, animal hides
and many other commodities.
Strategic Alliance
The company that has growth
through the strategic alliance is Nokia and Microsoft, Nokia and Microsoft on 11th February, 2011
announced plans to form a broad strategic partnership that would use their
complementary strengths and expertise to create a new global mobile ecosystem.
Nokia and Microsoft intend to jointly create market-leading mobile products and
services designed to offer consumers, operators and developer’s unrivaled
choice and opportunity. As each company would focus on its core competencies,
the partnership would create the opportunity for rapid time to market execution.
Merger
and Acquisition
The
company that has growth through M&A is Disney and Pixar merging for
DisneyPixar.
3)
After
merging the two companies AG Barr and Britvic, the new company named Barr
Britvic Soft drinks PLC is founded. Now, 63% of shares are owned by Britvic shareholders
and 37 % of shares are owned by AG Barr shareholders.
The
merger strategies have brings many positive aspects to the company and some of
them are:
·
The cost reduction is very effective
especially in difficult or strong markets because AG Barr is strong in certain
market which now will help for Britvic to go in that market and vice versa.
·
The newly combine company will be
benefited from the economy of the scale.
·
With the combination, there will be better chance for the company
to compete with Coke by entering in some new market and thus gaining market
shares.
·
Loyal customers of both the
company will be buying the products of the newly merged company. There is a high
chance of shift from some other brand to the company’s brand.
The potential risk of merger
between Britvic and Barr are:
·
The customer dissatisfaction
for one product has negative impact on another product. For instance, if a
loyal customer of Barr has a bad experience with the service or products of
Britvic, then the customer may shift from Barr to other brand as Barr and
Britvic are combined. Hence, there is a high chance of customers shifting to
another brand because of their customers’ dissatisfaction.
·
Britvic’s half of the turnover comes from a low margin bottling
hence, merger with Barr may not have helped Britvic to resolve their problems.
·
Britvic’s half of the turnover comes from a low margin bottling
hence, merger with Barr may not have helped Britvic to resolve their problems.
Advice
and suggestion to the new board:
·
There should be equal support and
coordination among the staffs and board members for the new brand.
·
The flow of communication must be
effective and the whole company should have common vision and strategy.
·
The investment should be increase in
order to gain the quick market share and unnecessary expenses should be cutoff.
References
·
Johnson,
Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, Pearson
Education, Chapter 6
·
Johnson,
Whittington and Scholes (2011) Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, Pearson
Education, Chapter 10
·
Online available from http://www.business-sale.com/expanding-your-business-through-m-and-a.html [Accessed March 21,
2013]
·
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home